Ultramark

May. 10th, 2005 11:48 am
beige_alert: (Default)
[personal profile] beige_alert
@#$%^%$%$#^ Ultramark



Still some Ultramark in the ion source even after, um, a month or so...

qual browser view of Ultramark peaks

(Ultramark is used to calibrate Finnigan mass spectrometers. It’s sticky, and tends to stick around even after repeated acetone washes. Really, the ultramark isn’t our main problem right now. Our real problem is a big mass of strong peaks from an unknown source.)

Date: 2005-05-10 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigertoy.livejournal.com
Um, I hate to burst your bubble, but I don't have enough context to interpret the graphs. What are they supposed to look like?

Date: 2005-05-10 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beige-alert.livejournal.com
I don't imagine that lots of Finnigan users are reading this and saying "Frickn' Ultramark!" but then [livejournal.com profile] popefelix probably doesn't have lots of people fascinated by his FREDdy Gamma Ray Burst notes, either. He's my inspiration for this kind of thing.

Anyway, this was a blank, so in theory the top graph, which is total signal (y) vs. time (x), ought to be pretty flat (since nothing was injected), and the bottom graph, which is the mass spectrum at a particular time (indicated by the red line in the top plot), and which is signal intensity vs. mass-to-charge-ration, shouldn't have much in it. A little noise, maybe a few low-mass peaks, not much since this was a blank injection. The series of evenly-spaced peaks at the right is in fact residual calibration mix from the last calibration, something like a month ago. You'd think it would all be gone by now, but no....

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 14th, 2026 10:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios